This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Does a 2nd review of school meal applications reduce errors?
Performing an independent review of school meal applications
客户端
食物及营养署挑战
每年, local education agencies (LEAs) review the information provided by households on school meal applications and determine whether the students in the household are eligible to receive free, 价格低廉, 或者学校伙食.
健康的, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (HHFKA) added a provision that requires certain LEAs to conduct a 2nd, independent review of applications (IRA) of those school meal applications to verify that the correct determination has been reached.
The IRA process was first implemented in school year 2014-15. Data from the first 2 years that the IRA process was in place showed that few errors were caught during the 2nd review, 这是出乎意料的.
对美国来说.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) 食物及营养署, 趣赢平台 conducted the Independent Review of Applications (IRA) Study to understand the IRA process and whether it is effective at identifying and correcting errors.
解决方案
The study included both a process and an outcomes assessment.
The process assessment examined how all state agencies and 30 LEAs implement the IRA requirement. The outcomes assessment involved collecting household application data and assessing eligibility for each application, and then comparing the study team’s eligibility determinations to the LEAs’ determinations.
综上所述, the process and outcomes assessments describe the IRA process, provide insight into the types and causes of errors, and offer recommendations to improve the process.
The study also involved multimode data collection, 包括在线调查, 电话采访, and abstraction of households’ paper and electronic applications for school meals.
结果
LEAs usually classify student eligibility for school meals correctly; less than 5% of applications were classified in error.
LEAs report that the 2 biggest challenges with the IRA process are:
- Receiving incomplete/illegible applications from households
- Having available staff to conduct a 2nd review of applications
States perceive that LEAs of all sizes struggle to complete the IRA process within the required 10-day timeframe.
See the FNS website for the full report: Evaluation of the Independent Review of Applications in USDA Child Nutrition Programs.
资深专家联系人
林赛·J. Giesen
首席研究助理
-
的角度来看
Highlights of 趣赢平台 at AAPOR 20242024年5月
We’ve returned from the 79th Annual American Association for Public Opinion 研究 (AAPOR) Conference, 于5月15日至17日在亚特兰大举行, where we caught up with colleagues…
-
专家访谈
PMGE: Blueprint for Culturally Responsive Evaluations2024年5月
Long known for its cutting-edge studies, 规划办公室, 研究, 与评估(OPRE), a department of the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), 已经……
-
的角度来看
韦斯特@ AAPOR 20242024年5月
趣赢平台 experts are excited to head to Atlanta May 15-17, 2024, for the American Association for Public Opinion 研究 (AAPOR) 79th Annual Conference. 我们自豪…